1963 Isuzu Bellett vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1983 Jeep CJ is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Bellett (90 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1983 Jeep CJ. (85 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Bellett should accelerate faster than 1983 Jeep CJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 366 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (128 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Isuzu Bellett | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Bellett | CJ |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 924 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2380 mm |
