1963 Isuzu Bellett vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 176 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (84 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Bellett weights approximately 242 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (123 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Isuzu Bellett | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
| Make | Isuzu | Lotus |
| Model | Bellett | Emme |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 84 HP | 260 HP |
| Torque | 123 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Top Speed | 150 km/hour | 275 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2770 mm |
