1963 Isuzu Bellett vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (294 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (84 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 820 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (411 Nm) has 288 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Bellett. 2005 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1963 Isuzu Bellett has manual transmission. 1963 Isuzu Bellett will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Isuzu Bellett 2005 Jaguar XJ
Make Isuzu Jaguar
Model Bellett XJ
Year Released 1963 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1584 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 84 HP 294 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 123 Nm 411 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.7:1 11.0:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 920 kg 1740 kg
Vehicle Length 4000 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1500 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 3040 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 85 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]