1963 Isuzu Minx vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1965 Triumph 2000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1965 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1965 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Minx | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Isuzu | Triumph |
Model | Minx | 2000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 64 L |