1963 Isuzu Minx vs. 1998 Mazda Laputa

To start off, 1998 Mazda Laputa is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Isuzu Minx (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1998 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 280 kg more than 1998 Mazda Laputa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Isuzu Minx (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda Laputa.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Isuzu Minx 1998 Mazda Laputa
Make Isuzu Mazda
Model Minx Laputa
Year Released 1963 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1491 cc 657 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 62 HP 52 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 63 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 68 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 60.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 750 kg
Vehicle Length 4120 mm 3400 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 30 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]