1963 Isuzu Minx vs. 2003 Daewoo Magnus
To start off, 2003 Daewoo Magnus is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Daewoo Magnus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Magnus (129 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Magnus should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Magnus weights approximately 520 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Magnus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Daewoo Magnus (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Daewoo Magnus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Minx. 2003 Daewoo Magnus has automatic transmission and 1963 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1963 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Daewoo Magnus will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Minx | 2003 Daewoo Magnus | |
Make | Isuzu | Daewoo |
Model | Minx | Magnus |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 65 L |