1963 Isuzu Minx vs. 2004 Seat Toledo

To start off, 2004 Seat Toledo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Seat Toledo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Seat Toledo (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Seat Toledo should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Seat Toledo weights approximately 404 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Seat Toledo (250 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Minx.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Isuzu Minx 2004 Seat Toledo
Make Isuzu Seat
Model Minx Toledo
Year Released 1963 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1491 cc 1896 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 62 HP 104 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 1900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 95.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.3:1 19.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1434 kg
Vehicle Length 4120 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1580 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 55 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]