1963 Isuzu Minx vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 216 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Minx. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1963 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1963 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Isuzu Minx | 2012 Holden Calais | |
Make | Isuzu | Holden |
Model | Minx | Calais |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 112 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |