1963 Isuzu Minx vs. 2012 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2012 Kia Cee'd is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Kia Cee'd (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1963 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 328 kg more than 1963 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Kia Cee'd, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Cee'd (255 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Cee'd will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Isuzu Minx | 2012 Kia Cee'd | |
| Make | Isuzu | Kia |
| Model | Minx | Cee'd |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 1900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 77.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 84.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 17.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1358 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 53 L |
