1963 Jaguar MK II vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 400 kg more than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK II | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Jaguar | Matra-Simca |
Model | MK II | Murena |
Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 2154 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 91.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 81.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2440 mm |