1963 Jaguar MK II vs. 2000 Volkswagen Lupo

To start off, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. (59 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 596 kg more than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo. (140 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volkswagen Lupo.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Jaguar MK II 2000 Volkswagen Lupo
Make Jaguar Volkswagen
Model MK II Lupo
Year Released 1963 2000
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2482 cc 1191 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 120 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 195 Nm 140 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83 mm 76.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.5 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 19.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1450 kg 854 kg
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 3540 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1630 mm
Vehicle Height 1600 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2330 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.6 L/100km 3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 34 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]