1963 Jaguar MK II vs. 2004 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2004 Nissan Sentra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,506 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Sentra (165 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 197 kg more than 2004 Nissan Sentra.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Sentra (244 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Sentra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK II | 2004 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | MK II | Sentra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 2506 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1253 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |