1963 Jaguar MK II vs. 2005 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Mazda B3000 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1963 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK II | 2005 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK II | B3000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 62 L |