1963 Jaguar MK II vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK II weights approximately 465 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar MK II | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | MK II | Clio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 2482 cc | 1149 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 76.8 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2480 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 50 L |
