1963 Jaguar MK II vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (253 HP) has 133 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jaguar MK II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (288 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar MK II. (195 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar MK II.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK II | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Jaguar | Chevrolet |
Model | MK II | Captiva |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2482 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 253 HP |
Torque | 195 Nm | 288 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |