1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1970 Triumph 2000 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1970 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 1970 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 645 kg more than 1970 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 225 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Triumph |
Model | MK X | 2000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |