1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan
To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (77 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2000 Lada Tarzan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 845 kg more than 2000 Lada Tarzan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jaguar MK X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lada Tarzan. (117 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lada Tarzan.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 2000 Lada Tarzan | |
Make | Jaguar | Lada |
Model | MK X | Tarzan |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 1499 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 77 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1045 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2500 mm |