1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 316 kg more than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Sable. (248 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
Model | MK X | Sable |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 360 Nm | 248 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |