1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 650 kg more than 2003 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (195 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
Model | MK X | 3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 55 L |