1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2004 Rover 75
To start off, 2004 Rover 75 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 2004 Rover 75. (129 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2004 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 305 kg more than 2004 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 75. (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 2004 Rover 75 | |
Make | Jaguar | Rover |
Model | MK X | 75 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |