1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 2005 Saab 9000. (165 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Saab 9000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 225 kg more than 2005 Saab 9000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Saab 9000. (280 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Saab 9000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
Make | Jaguar | Saab |
Model | MK X | 9000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 2290 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 280 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 1665 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 61 L |