1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2005 Smart Coupe
To start off, 2005 Smart Coupe is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2005 Smart Coupe. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 1160 kg more than 2005 Smart Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Coupe. (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar MK X | 2005 Smart Coupe | |
| Make | Jaguar | Smart |
| Model | MK X | Coupe |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 3780 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1890 kg | 730 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 1820 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 33 L |
