1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2005 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2005 Smart Roadster is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2005 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart Roadster. (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 2005 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Jaguar | Smart |
Model | MK X | Roadster |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 66.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 67 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 35 L |