1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 109 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar MK X | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | MK X | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3780 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2490 mm |