1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK X (252 HP) has 153 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar MK X | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Jaguar | Aston Martin |
| Model | MK X | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3780 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 99 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
