1963 Jaguar MK X vs. 2012 Holden Calais
To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,780 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar MK X. (252 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar MK X.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar MK X | 2012 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Jaguar | Holden |
| Model | MK X | Calais |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3780 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 278 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
