1963 Jaguar S-Type vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 735 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1963 Jaguar S-Type is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar S-Type. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar S-Type | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Jaguar | Renault |
| Model | S-Type | Clio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2770 mm |
