1963 Jaguar S-Type vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2005 Mercury Sable is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar S-Type (220 HP) has 67 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar S-Type weights approximately 157 kg more than 2005 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar S-Type (325 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Sable. (252 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar S-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar S-Type | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
Model | S-Type | Sable |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2760 mm |