1963 Jaguar S-Type vs. 2005 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Korando is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar S-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar S-Type (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2005 SsangYong Korando. (148 HP @ 4100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 2005 SsangYong Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Korando weights approximately 170 kg more than 1963 Jaguar S-Type.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar S-Type (325 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 SsangYong Korando. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar S-Type will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 SsangYong Korando.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar S-Type | 2005 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | Jaguar | SsangYong |
| Model | S-Type | Korando |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.1 mm | 90.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 1840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2490 mm |
