1963 Jaguar Type S vs. 1978 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 1978 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jaguar Type S weights approximately 471 kg more than 1978 Oldsmobile Omega.
Because 1963 Jaguar Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Oldsmobile Omega, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar Type S | 1978 Oldsmobile Omega | |
| Make | Jaguar | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Type S | Omega |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1149 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2670 mm |
