1963 Jaguar Type S vs. 1992 Mercury Villager
To start off, 1992 Mercury Villager is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar Type S (208 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1992 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar Type S should accelerate faster than 1992 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Mercury Villager weights approximately 180 kg more than 1963 Jaguar Type S.
Because 1963 Jaguar Type S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar Type S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jaguar Type S | 1992 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Jaguar | Mercury |
Model | Type S | Villager |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2860 mm |