1963 Jaguar Type S vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar Type S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 26 kg more than 1963 Jaguar Type S.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jaguar Type S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar Type S (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1963 Jaguar Type S will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar Type S | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | Jaguar | Toyota |
| Model | Type S | Condor |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 2436 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 5020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |
