1963 Jaguar Type S vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar Type S (208 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2010 Jeep Wrangler. (205 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar Type S should accelerate faster than 2010 Jeep Wrangler. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 247 kg more than 1963 Jaguar Type S.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar Type S. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar Type S.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Jaguar Type S 2010 Jeep Wrangler
Make Jaguar Jeep
Model Type S Wrangler
Year Released 1963 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3442 cc 3800 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 208 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 5550 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 325 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 1867 kg
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 4684 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 2103 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 82 L