1963 Jaguar Type S vs. 2011 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2011 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar Type S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar Type S would be higher. At 4,394 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover LR3 (296 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Jaguar Type S. (208 HP @ 5550 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jaguar Type S.
Because 2011 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jaguar Type S. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover LR3 (316 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jaguar Type S. (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jaguar Type S.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jaguar Type S | 2011 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Land Rover |
| Model | Type S | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3442 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 296 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5550 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
