1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1973 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 122 kg more than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jeep CJ5 | 1973 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Jeep | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CJ5 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 120 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2360 mm |
