1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1980 Lada 1200
To start off, 1980 Lada 1200 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 87 kg more than 1980 Lada 1200.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lada 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 1980 Lada 1200 | |
Make | Jeep | Lada |
Model | CJ5 | 1200 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 85 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2430 mm |