1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1983 Mazda 929
To start off, 1983 Mazda 929 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mazda 929 (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mazda 929 weights approximately 118 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1983 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 1983 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Jeep | Mazda |
Model | CJ5 | 929 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |