1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1991 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Renault Clio (93 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 37 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Jeep | Renault |
Model | CJ5 | Clio |
Year Released | 1963 | 1991 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2480 mm |