1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2002 Proton Tiara
To start off, 2002 Proton Tiara is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 252 kg more than 2002 Proton Tiara.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Proton Tiara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton Tiara. (90 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton Tiara.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 2002 Proton Tiara | |
Make | Jeep | Proton |
Model | CJ5 | Tiara |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 780 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2290 mm |