1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2002 Suzuki SX4
To start off, 2002 Suzuki SX4 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Suzuki SX4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Suzuki SX4 has automatic transmission and 1963 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Suzuki SX4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 2002 Suzuki SX4 | |
Make | Jeep | Suzuki |
Model | CJ5 | SX4 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |