1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 67 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Jeep CJ5 | 2003 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Jeep | MCC |
| Model | CJ5 | Smart |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1124 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 73 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 100 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2510 mm |
