1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2004 Nissan 350Z

To start off, 2004 Nissan 350Z is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan 350Z (287 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan 350Z weights approximately 427 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Nissan 350Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan 350Z (372 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Jeep CJ5 2004 Nissan 350Z
Make Jeep Nissan
Model CJ5 350Z
Year Released 1963 2004
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2199 cc 3490 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 59 HP 287 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 145 Nm 372 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Vehicle Weight 1032 kg 1459 kg
Vehicle Length 3520 mm 4310 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1740 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2060 mm 2660 mm