1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2006 Peugeot 407
To start off, 2006 Peugeot 407 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,230 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Peugeot 407 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Peugeot 407 (156 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Peugeot 407 should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Peugeot 407. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Peugeot 407 (217 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Peugeot 407 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 2006 Peugeot 407 | |
Make | Jeep | Peugeot |
Model | CJ5 | 407 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 217 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2730 mm |