1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2012 Honda Civic
To start off, 2012 Honda Civic is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. Both 1963 Jeep CJ5 and 2012 Honda Civic are equipped with a 2,199 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda Civic (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Honda Civic. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda Civic (350 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm). This means 2012 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 2012 Honda Civic | |
Make | Jeep | Honda |
Model | CJ5 | Civic |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2199 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1460 mm |