1963 Jeep CJ5 vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 426 kg more than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Jeep CJ5.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jeep CJ5 | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jeep | Mini |
Model | CJ5 | Countryman |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 145 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1458 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3520 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2595 mm |