1963 Jensen 541 vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jensen 541. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jensen 541 would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jensen 541 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jensen 541 (129 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jensen 541 should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jensen 541 weights approximately 105 kg more than 2006 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Jensen 541. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jensen 541 (310 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1963 Jensen 541 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Jensen 541 | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Jensen | Toyota |
Model | 541 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 1784 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 156 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.3 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 91.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 45 L |