1963 Lancia Appia vs. 2000 Mercury Sable

To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 2,982 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 745 kg more than 1963 Lancia Appia.

Because 1963 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Mercury Sable has automatic transmission and 1963 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1963 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Mercury Sable will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Lancia Appia 2000 Mercury Sable
Make Lancia Mercury
Model Appia Sable
Year Released 1963 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1090 cc 2982 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 152 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 820 kg 1565 kg
Vehicle Length 3880 mm 5030 mm
Vehicle Width 1430 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 42 L 68 L