1963 Lancia Appia vs. 2004 MCC Silverpulse
To start off, 2004 MCC Silverpulse is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,090 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lancia Appia is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 MCC Silverpulse has automatic transmission and 1963 Lancia Appia has manual transmission. 1963 Lancia Appia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 MCC Silverpulse will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Appia | 2004 MCC Silverpulse | |
Make | Lancia | MCC |
Model | Appia | Silverpulse |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 52 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |