1963 Lancia Appia vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,390 cc, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 289 kg more than 1963 Lancia Appia.
Because 1963 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Appia | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Lancia | Volkswagen |
Model | Appia | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1390 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1109 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 45 L |