1963 Lancia Appia vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2006 Suzuki Reno is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Appia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Appia would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 245 kg more than 1963 Lancia Appia.
Because 1963 Lancia Appia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lancia Appia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Lancia Appia | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Lancia | Suzuki |
Model | Appia | Reno |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1090 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 55 L |